Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Warforged Druid Gaming Art and Module Again

  1. #ane

    Default Suggestion: Warforged improvements

    I noticed when I tried to brand a warforged Monk that you could however purchase the Mithril/Adamant peel options...but these count equally armor and brand you lot basically a non-monk.

    There should either be a way to "purchase off" the "counts as armor" function of these feats afterwards (via additional feats that do null else, for case) or a warning "Purchasing this feat volition foreclose well-nigh of your Monk abilties from functioning" I haven't fabricated a Warforged mage or other caster yet, but I'm bold these feats will also mess upwardly those classes...

    Also, how about making "female" warforged have a more lithe, femininine looking "Chasis" - Slender waist, less beefy arms and legs, and a "forepart porch" will brand the female sounds the grapheme makes a bit less silly.


  2. #2

    Default

    Yeah, the warforged females don't look any different right now. There is no point in even changing your gender.

    As well, that alert would be squeamish for new players that wouldn't know that getting those feats would make them un-centered.

    While we are at it, they demand to add together a warning to all feats that you will get by leveling up maxim that you will get them by leveling up. I deleted the starting time ranger I made because it didn't tell me that I would get rapid shot at level 2.

    +i.

    Last edited by Internetisrsbsn; 06-17-2010 at 07:32 PM.

    If you lot ever go stuck in the hay, you should an hero.


  3. #three

    Default

    Well in the class description it states which abilities volition not work with armor (well-nigh) and the feats you mentioned descritions include what type of armor they are treated as. Putting the two together should exist enough to say hey, look this might be a bad idea. You can not use evasion in medium or heavy armor, so using the body feats will forestall that skill. The trunk feats have cabalistic spell failure in the descritions so information technology should come as no suprise when an cabalistic spell caster fails a spell check. I empathise it takes some reading and planning when creating a character but that is what DnD is all about. So much of the feel of DnD has already been taking out of the game, lets not brand graphic symbol cosmos dummy proof.

    Winston Churchill:
    "Whatever man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any human being who is over 30, and is non a bourgeois, has no brains."


  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xanvar View Post

    Well in the course description it states which abilities will non work with armor (nearly) and the feats yous mentioned descritions include what blazon of armor they are treated as. Putting the two together should exist enough to say hey, expect this might exist a bad idea. You tin can not use evasion in medium or heavy armor, so using the body feats volition foreclose that skill. The body feats have arcane spell failure in the descritions then it should come as no suprise when an cabalistic spell caster fails a spell bank check. I understand it takes some reading and planning when creating a character but that is what DnD is all about. And then much of the experience of DnD has already been taking out of the game, lets not brand character creation dummy proof.

    I don't call up everyone pays attention to the data on the side, but if they do then yes it is obvious. I know from personal experience that a lot of other MMOs give you useless/obvious information in the class info. areas. Like when I ringlet a druid on WoW, I remember I would know that they can heal. Thanks for stating the obvious.

    If you lot ever get stuck in the hay, yous should an hero.


  5. #5

    Default

    Deplorable, female warforged looking similar females is strictly prohibited. Don't y'all know if you lot mix something even remotely robot-similar human, female, and fighting together, you get some unwanted results... like otaku fans.


    Leave female person warforged as is. We don't need these running around in the D&D World!


    The Anti-Conformist

    Quote Originally Posted past Zigana View Post

    ...It was a dwarven thrower--yous know, it throws dwarves!


  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted past DToNE View Post

    Sorry, female warforged looking similar females is strictly prohibited. Don't you know if you mix something even remotely robot-like homo, female, and fighting together, you go some unwanted results... like otaku fans.


    Go out female warforged every bit is. We don't need these running around in the D&D World!

    Now that you put it this style, perhaps we tin make a couple of changes to WF females

    Winston Churchill:
    "Any human being who is under xxx, and is non a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a bourgeois, has no brains."


  7. #7

    Default

    I don't think that a WF Monk should ever be able to "piece of work off" the torso feats. They count equally armor because they are armor. No other race can armor their Monk, so I think that a WF being able to would be unbalancing.

    A WF pulley tin can reduce their Spell Failure, even so, with the Inscribed Armor enhancements. This mirrors the Elven Arcane Fluidity line of enhancements - so at least WF don't have an advantage over every other race. In fact, a WF has to take the beginning level of Inscribed Armor in order to totally negate any chance of Spell Neglect. Composite body still counts as armor for arcane spells, and has a spell faill chance until the enhancement is taken. So, in that regard, WF are down one enhancement over other races ( but worth it, imho ).

    Lastly, both Adamantine Body and Mithral Body clearly country that they are counted every bit armor - so the fact that they negate Monk abilities that don't work while armored should be pretty articulate.

    Equally for WF getting a female body template... there is not supposed to be a visual difference, every bit WF themselves are inherently sexless. They make a choice dependent on their personality to be labeled and treated equally "male" or "female person".
    But... I call up that a different torso type for the genders would still exist a good thought, game-lore or no. Many aspects of PnP have been changed for the sake of the game - I'd accept no problem with that being one of em.

    Exit, pursued by a bear. ~ William Shakespeare (stage direction from The Wintertime'southward Tale)

    .59730.


  8. #eight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted past xanvar View Post

    Now that you lot put it this way, maybe nosotros can make a couple of changes to WF females

    Pervert. :/

    If y'all ever get stuck in the hay, you should an hero.


  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted past Internetisrsbsn View Post

    Pervert. :/

    Cheers!

    Winston Churchill:
    "Any human being who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has non eye; and any man who is over xxx, and is not a bourgeois, has no brains."


  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rahubby View Post

    Also, how well-nigh making "female" warforged have a more lithe, femininine looking "Chasis" - Slender waist, less bulky arms and legs, and a "front end porch" will make the female sounds the graphic symbol makes a bit less airheaded.

    They were fabricated as tools of war. Personality was of minimal concern.

    Something that's always annoyed me... what would the purpose of breasts be on something that isn't a mammal.


  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted past Memnir View Post

    Lastly, both Adamantine Torso and Mithral Body clearly land that they are counted as armor - then the fact that they negate Monk abilities that don't work while armored should be pretty clear.

    Once again, not anybody is going to read the side data considering it is useless in many MMOs.

    If you ever get stuck in the hay, you should an hero.


  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xanvar View Post

    Thank Yous!

    I was expecting y'all to defend yourself confronting my claim that you are a debauchee.

    If you e'er get stuck in the hay, you should an hero.


  13. #13

    Winston Churchill:
    "Whatever man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is non a bourgeois, has no brains."


  14. #xiv

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xanvar View Post

    I would only you lot probably would non desire to read the information

    What makes you think that?

    If you lot e'er become stuck in the hay, you should an hero.


  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Internetisrsbsn View Post

    Again, not everyone is going to read the side information because it is useless in many MMOs.

    If they tin't exist bothered to read the information that is already presented - then I can't be bothered to take sympathy for them.

    The information is in that location already... and I call back that players should be more proactive and not expect to be mollycoddled at every turn and have the game spoon feed them everything.

    Get out, pursued by a bear. ~ William Shakespeare (stage management from The Wintertime's Tale)

    .59730.


  16. #xvi

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Memnir View Post

    If they can't be bothered to read the information that is already presented - then I tin can't exist bothered to take sympathy for them.

    The information is there already... and I recollect that players should be more proactive and not expect to exist mollycoddled at every plow and have the game spoon feed them everything.

    Fair enough. I'1000 only explaining why a lot of people ignore the side data.

    If you ever become stuck in the hay, you should an hero.


  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TreknaQudane View Post

    They were made as tools of state of war. Personality was of minimal concern.

    Something that's always annoyed me... what would the purpose of breasts be on something that isn't a mammal.

    You have to take SOMEWHERE to plug in the extension cords...Who says the Wizards who built the Warforged don't sometimes like the "female look" better? Maybe some of themselves fancy themselves artists and they think of the warforged's "look" as a piece of work of art.

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rahubby View Post

    You lot accept to accept SOMEWHERE to plug in the extension cords...Who says the Wizards who built the Warforged don't sometimes like the "female look" improve? Maybe some of themselves fancy themselves artists and they think of the warforged's "look" as a work of art.

    I know this was written equally a joke... But that really makes sense.

parkermasconew.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ddo.com/forums/showthread.php/255810-Suggestion-Warforged-improvements?s=380fabff638096242f0016903d0a9711

Post a Comment for "Warforged Druid Gaming Art and Module Again"